The Abodes Of The Guilty

 

Below is a utube that was in a regular email I receive from a Catholic Jew hater.  Believe this bullshit if you like.  There is plenty of it, no shortage of material blaming the Jews for everything from the cause of WWII to the world financial situation we face today.  Never a word about what their Popes have been up to.

 

 

I have discovered something lately.  Well, actually these past couples of years.

I have discovered I can’t talk about a certain power and remain socially acceptable.

I have discovered if I dare talk or write about this certain power and disseminate the information I have learned I will be unacceptable.

This power is controlling people’s minds.  What they should think.  How they should behave.  And the proof is everywhere who this power is.  It’s the Roman Catholic Church.

Check if I not right.  Write something about the Pope and see how far you get.  See if you are invited into the homes, if you are returned phone calls.

You will discover as I have, that instead of the Jews as many will insist are the ones that you cannot criticise, it is actually the Roman Catholic Church and the Pope that are sacrosanct, beyond the reach of criticism.  And you will discover that you will be made a social pariah and remain friendless as I am in a new town these past four months.

Who Rules Over Me.jpg

Whether Voltaire said the above is irrelevant.  What is relevant is that Rome Rules Most of Us.  There will always be a tiny minority who will never surrender.

Will you too kiss his ring?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nazi Parellels

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Third Reich Historical Overview

Ever enjoyed a Fanta at Maccas:

http://yournewswire.com/11-popular-brands-of-today-that-worked-with-hitler-the-nazi-party/

Ever filled up at Mobil or BP:

http://web.mit.edu/thistle/www/v13/3/oil.html

Here’s the evidence that would hang anyone but the highly connected and protected;

http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/research/bushcrimefamily.html

On my website page ‘My Story’ at http://www.britishfortress.com/My_Story.html I tell about how I was bowled over by a ten-ton truck when I was thirteen.  That truck was a Mobil truck that serviced the farms around the district where I lived at Beenleigh.

That truck was not in serviceable condition, according to a report from the machinery department of the Queensland Government and as a result this Nazi truck careeded into me.  As I was a minor my parents sued Mobil.  I got a paltry sum.  After some years later I was no longer able to work, and after five decades, after living in poverty for many years I have considerable pain from spinal disease and also from my right hip.

So I’d like to see these penny-pinching Bush’s hang for their treason.  It’s personal!!!

Stop Press!

George Pell about to be charged if the police have the guts:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-31/george-pell-if-police-charge-thearchishop-were-in-new-territory/8565204

Read about Pell’s Vatican Bank and what it’s been up to since the closing days of WWII:

http://www.britishfortress.com

 

More Third Reich YouTubes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tavistock Institute and Common Purpose

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nazi Fourth Reich Planning

http://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2010/07/31/christopher-story/

 

Concordat Watch:

http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=843

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pope’s NWO is Hitler’s 3rd Reich

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Agnostic Regarding Ellen White

by Shane Sigley www.britishfortress.com

After more than thirty-six years I have decided to become an agnostic regarding Ellen
White. I do not do this lightly but with serious deliberation. I have decided to base my argument upon just one simple proposition, ie. Was Adam present at the temptation of Eve by Satan in the Garden of Eden or was he not. The reason for choosing this incident is that there can be no words to convince one to one side or the other. Just a simple question that has only two possible answers.
Was Adam present at the temptation of Eve at the tree of the knowledge of good and evil or was he not present at the temptation of Eve at the tree of the knowledge of good and evil?
And the bible will be my judge and my rule in this matter.
EGW “I saw that the holy angels often visited the garden (of Eden), and gave instruction to Adam and Eve concerning their employment, and also taught them concerning the rebellion of Satan and his fall. The angels warned them of Satan, and cautioned them not to separate from each other in their employment, … Satan commenced his work with Eve, to cause her to disobey. She first erred in wandering from her husband, next, in lingering around the forbidden tree.” – Spiritual Gifts, vol. 1, p.20 written in 1858.
“The angels had cautioned Eve to beware of separating herself from her husband … But
absorbed in her pleasing task, she unconsciously wandered from his side. On perceiving
that she was alone, she felt an apprehension of danger. … She soon found herself gazing
with mingled curiosity and admiration upon the forbidden tree.” – Patriarchs and Prophets, pp. 53, 54, written in 1890. “Without a fear she plucked and ate. And now, having herself transgressed, she became the agent of Satan in working the ruin of her husband. In a state of strange, unnatural excitement, with her hand filled with the forbidden fruit, she sought his presence. … He (Adam) mourned that he had permitted Eve to wander from his side.” – Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 56 written in 1890.
Ellen White’s three quotes above stated that Adam was not present at the temptation of Eve at the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. By the way, there is a gap of thirty-two years between the first quote and the last two quotes. Enough time I would think to iron out ‘mistakes’. Which means this was a deliberate teaching. Here is what the Holy Bible says about the matter:
Genesis 3:3-6 King James Version (KJV)
3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye
shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened,
and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant
to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and
did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
Verse 6 says “her husband with her”. That’s all the proof I need.

That’s all the proof I need. So there it is. My stand for the Holy Bible. I can do no other. And a stand against unbiblical teachings. And from now on I am agnostic regarding Ellen White. Ellen White was to me, a godly woman, who brings people to a saving relationship with Christ. But her writings, no matter how good, and I’m questioning this at present, are not the Holy Bible. If she can’t agree with the Holy Bible on one simple fact of geography, ie where Adam was, when Eve was tempted, what else is there that may cast serious doubt upon important salvational doctrines of the Protestant faith.
She said that in the last days her writings would be of non-effect. (Selected Messages, book 2, p. 78. http://www.anym.org/SOP/en_2SM.pdf .)
Why is it that she is making her writings the focus of the last days instead of the Holy Bible?
Why is it that instead of the Holy Bible, adherence to her writings are made the standard for determining the validity of a Christian’s character?
It doesn’t matter what she or anyone else says in the matter. What matters is what the Holy Bible says! And how many instances in her writings do I need, to declare a justified judgement, that I have lost confidence in her writings?

And how many instances in her writings do I need, to declare a justified judgement, that I have lost confidence in her writings?
I’ll tell you, in such a clear-cut case as this, ie the geography of Adam, I only need one.
Notes: The barn conferences that were held over a period of time, where the Seventh-day Adventist Church doctrines were thrashed out. In my opinion, these conferences may have had the impress of the Holy Spirit. If so, I am not going to reject the doctrines of the church, as I have also proved these doctrines without recourse to Ellen Whites writings. What I’m saying is that the doctrines of the Seventh-day Adventist Church are not dependent on the writings of Ellen White, but stand as bible-based
doctrines independent of her writings. And the choice is made so clear thanks to Ellen White’s insistence to have Adam not present at Eve’s temptation. Thanks, Ellen, for making it so much clearer. It couldn’t have been made more clear and we have you
and all your writing staff revisors who saw fit to leave Adam out of the picture as Eve was tempted. God’s hand is definitely in this, to give us a clear word of biblical  exposition. I for one will obey Ellen’s plea to us all to put the Holy Bible first and last in
these last days and to look to the cross, our only hope of glory!

Check out my other blog at http://www.tothecrossfellowship.wordpress.com/

or https://www.facebook.com/tothecrossfellowship/#

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment